- #BENCHMARKS DELETED FROM GEEKBENCH ALLEGATIONS UPDATE#
- #BENCHMARKS DELETED FROM GEEKBENCH ALLEGATIONS FULL#
- #BENCHMARKS DELETED FROM GEEKBENCH ALLEGATIONS ANDROID#
#BENCHMARKS DELETED FROM GEEKBENCH ALLEGATIONS UPDATE#
Samsung committed to releasing a software update that addresses GOS throttling, but. The removal is due to allegations that OnePlus designed Oxygen OS optimization tools in such a way that Geekbench. Geekbench saw this behavior as benchmark manipulation and delisted the Galaxy S22, S21, S20, and S10. Geekbench (geekbench) MaAs a result, Gebench has decided to remove the Galaxy S-Series crop from the last four years from their publicly searchable database because they consider their. Popular benchmark site Geekbench has removed OnePlus 9 benchmarks from its charts.
Instead, it came out like they are cheating. We view this as a form of benchmark manipulation as major benchmark applications, including Geekbench, are not throttled by this service. If OnePlus told users they do such optimizations to improve battery life and still give good performance where it matters and maybe even a toggle to turn this off entirely, then there would be no problem. and still claims that non-gaming applications are not on the service list at all. It is done with good intentions, but is misinterpreted because of bad communication between company and users. The Galaxy Tab S8 was also removed from the GeekBench benchmark list. I'd say this has the same issue as Apple's "battery gate" drama. Which I'd very much welcome more than just dumb task killers that Chinese vendors obsess over so much in general and which you can't turn off in most cases, just disable and hope they're really off (which usually isn't the case). If that was in fact the case, then it's actually real optimization and not cheating.
#BENCHMARKS DELETED FROM GEEKBENCH ALLEGATIONS ANDROID#
The decision followed an Android Police report claiming the new Galaxy Tab S8 devices throttled Geekbench performance when it was disguised as the popular game Genshin Impact. Standings case materializes some performers worst fears about the control this technology gives companies over their voices. The only thing this post has done is find one inconsistent benchmark on one single device (the official score is being pulled from one of a few Geekbench scores uploaded all from the same Windows system). Geekbench on Monday announced it is permanently delisting the Samsung Galaxy Tab S8, the Tab S8 Plus and the Tab S8 Ultra from its benchmark rankings. Standings supporters say the TikTok lawsuit is not just about Standings voice - its about the future of an entire industry attempting to adapt to new advancements in the field of machine learning.
#BENCHMARKS DELETED FROM GEEKBENCH ALLEGATIONS FULL#
But is it really cheating? What's the point in giving some light load or background apps full throttle power of the X1 core which is by far the most power hungry? Or limiting some social network app that can't possibly ever need all the full grunt from the chipset (and which are all listed as ones that are throttled)? Just so it clocks to stupid speeds and eats battery faster? I'd be more interested in seeing if full power was given to benchmarks (why would one limit benchmarks?!) and lets say games or apps that actually require full raw compute power. Geekbench is a better test than the Witcher 3 when it is working properly and despite its flaws, than this arbitrary litmus test you've posed.
0 kommentar(er)
